<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Helixsoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.helixsoft.nl/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.helixsoft.nl/blog</link>
	<description>Martijn van Iersel&#039;s blog on bioinformatics and open source software development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:26:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The relation between Garbage bags and Databases by Oracle versus Google &#171; Helixsoft</title>
		<link>http://www.helixsoft.nl/blog/?p=208&#038;cpage=1#comment-612</link>
		<dc:creator>Oracle versus Google &#171; Helixsoft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.helixsoft.nl/blog/?p=208#comment-612</guid>
		<description>[...] A while back I wrote rather optimistically that I expected Oracle to play nice with the open source community [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A while back I wrote rather optimistically that I expected Oracle to play nice with the open source community [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on That&#8217;s Great, Now Please Fix OpenOffice.org by Martijn van Iersel</title>
		<link>http://www.helixsoft.nl/blog/?p=261&#038;cpage=1#comment-461</link>
		<dc:creator>Martijn van Iersel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 10:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.helixsoft.nl/blog/?p=261#comment-461</guid>
		<description>At first I thought it was a hoax too. But if it is then it&#039;s a really elaborate one. The associated blog is very active, and even has photos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first I thought it was a hoax too. But if it is then it&#8217;s a really elaborate one. The associated blog is very active, and even has photos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on That&#8217;s Great, Now Please Fix OpenOffice.org by Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.helixsoft.nl/blog/?p=261&#038;cpage=1#comment-460</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 08:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.helixsoft.nl/blog/?p=261#comment-460</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always had the impression that this mouse was just a hoax. I can&#039;t imagine anyone ever buying such a ugly looking thing. But you&#039;re right about OpenOffice. I&#039;ve used it but was not impressed. It just doesn&#039;t have &#039;it&#039;, whatever that is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always had the impression that this mouse was just a hoax. I can&#8217;t imagine anyone ever buying such a ugly looking thing. But you&#8217;re right about OpenOffice. I&#8217;ve used it but was not impressed. It just doesn&#8217;t have &#8216;it&#8217;, whatever that is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to develop Modular Software by The Downside of Modularity &#171; Helixsoft</title>
		<link>http://www.helixsoft.nl/blog/?p=241&#038;cpage=1#comment-437</link>
		<dc:creator>The Downside of Modularity &#171; Helixsoft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.helixsoft.nl/blog/?p=241#comment-437</guid>
		<description>[...] Helixsoft Martijn van Iersel&#039;s blog on bioinformatics and open source software development      &#171; How to develop Modular Software [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Helixsoft Martijn van Iersel&#39;s blog on bioinformatics and open source software development      &laquo; How to develop Modular Software [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Martijn&#8217;s Continuous Build System part 2 by How to develop Modular Software &#171; Helixsoft</title>
		<link>http://www.helixsoft.nl/blog/?p=109&#038;cpage=1#comment-430</link>
		<dc:creator>How to develop Modular Software &#171; Helixsoft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 18:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.helixsoft.nl/blog/?p=109#comment-430</guid>
		<description>[...] strong and healthy, monolithic software is sickly and bedridden. I&#8217;ve touched before on how modularity increases adaptability. But modularity also helps to keep software small, nimble and unbloated. I&#8217;ll illustrate how [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] strong and healthy, monolithic software is sickly and bedridden. I&#8217;ve touched before on how modularity increases adaptability. But modularity also helps to keep software small, nimble and unbloated. I&#8217;ll illustrate how [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The &#8220;Why&#8221; of the Identifier Mapping Problem by BridgeDb paper published &#171; Helixsoft</title>
		<link>http://www.helixsoft.nl/blog/?p=133&#038;cpage=1#comment-411</link>
		<dc:creator>BridgeDb paper published &#171; Helixsoft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.helixsoft.nl/blog/?p=133#comment-411</guid>
		<description>[...] your hearts content. BridgeDb is all about identifier mapping, which I blogged about before (here, here and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] your hearts content. BridgeDb is all about identifier mapping, which I blogged about before (here, here and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BatchMapper v0.1 by BridgeDb paper published &#171; Helixsoft</title>
		<link>http://www.helixsoft.nl/blog/?p=93&#038;cpage=1#comment-410</link>
		<dc:creator>BridgeDb paper published &#171; Helixsoft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.helixsoft.nl/blog/?p=93#comment-410</guid>
		<description>[...] it to your hearts content. BridgeDb is all about identifier mapping, which I blogged about before (here, here and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it to your hearts content. BridgeDb is all about identifier mapping, which I blogged about before (here, here and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The relation between Garbage bags and Databases by Gontran Zepeda</title>
		<link>http://www.helixsoft.nl/blog/?p=208&#038;cpage=1#comment-407</link>
		<dc:creator>Gontran Zepeda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 05:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.helixsoft.nl/blog/?p=208#comment-407</guid>
		<description>Spot on.  It *would be* natural for Oracle to create a further segmented product -- nice Joelon&#039; link;  but the EU wouldn&#039;t be looking tough on big business to the taxpayers if they just let these irrational cries from terrified mysql users -- who apparently don&#039;t understand F/OSS licensing at all -- go unheard!  

Well, really the gripe from the petition makers is that they&#039;ve gotten very used to a completely world class suite of free software that, effectively, is mySQL and don&#039;t want to pay for it now that they&#039;re hooked.  I know it would be slightly consterning to my organization if this lovely piece of free software went private or atrophy, but it wouldn&#039;t stop the show ... because of the license.  I haven&#039;t looked into it, but isn&#039;t Widenius already working on a fork called MariaDB?  Oh,  - an interesting perspective.

O&#039; The Contreversy!  Free software in the news but the story ultimately characterizes it as costing private industry money.  Black Eye again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spot on.  It *would be* natural for Oracle to create a further segmented product &#8212; nice Joelon&#8217; link;  but the EU wouldn&#8217;t be looking tough on big business to the taxpayers if they just let these irrational cries from terrified mysql users &#8212; who apparently don&#8217;t understand F/OSS licensing at all &#8212; go unheard!  </p>
<p>Well, really the gripe from the petition makers is that they&#8217;ve gotten very used to a completely world class suite of free software that, effectively, is mySQL and don&#8217;t want to pay for it now that they&#8217;re hooked.  I know it would be slightly consterning to my organization if this lovely piece of free software went private or atrophy, but it wouldn&#8217;t stop the show &#8230; because of the license.  I haven&#8217;t looked into it, but isn&#8217;t Widenius already working on a fork called MariaDB?  Oh,  &#8211; an interesting perspective.</p>
<p>O&#8217; The Contreversy!  Free software in the news but the story ultimately characterizes it as costing private industry money.  Black Eye again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Free movement of goods and persons by David</title>
		<link>http://www.helixsoft.nl/blog/?p=35&#038;cpage=1#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.helixsoft.nl/blog/?p=35#comment-402</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a slight difference between the four services you mentioned: iPlayer and Amazon sell services/products, which clearly fall under the free-movement laws you mentioned.
On the other hand, Last.fm provides a free service, to which those EU laws may not apply. If they do apply, thoguh, then you could also include BBC&#039;s iPlayer, which is also UK-only.
I&#039;d encourage you to try complaining to the European Commission, since it might well get us poor sods the services they get back in the UK. The European Commission&#039;s website is http://ec.europa.eu/ and they have it in Dutch as well as English. They respond within a day or two, and usually help you if you&#039;ve contacted the wrong people, as is all too easy with all those links they give!
Thanks for the post, and good luck if you try contacting the Commission!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a slight difference between the four services you mentioned: iPlayer and Amazon sell services/products, which clearly fall under the free-movement laws you mentioned.<br />
On the other hand, Last.fm provides a free service, to which those EU laws may not apply. If they do apply, thoguh, then you could also include BBC&#8217;s iPlayer, which is also UK-only.<br />
I&#8217;d encourage you to try complaining to the European Commission, since it might well get us poor sods the services they get back in the UK. The European Commission&#8217;s website is <a href="http://ec.europa.eu/" rel="nofollow">http://ec.europa.eu/</a> and they have it in Dutch as well as English. They respond within a day or two, and usually help you if you&#8217;ve contacted the wrong people, as is all too easy with all those links they give!<br />
Thanks for the post, and good luck if you try contacting the Commission!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mining biological pathways using WikiPathways web services by Groovy way to fix up a WikiPathways Pathway &#171; Helixsoft</title>
		<link>http://www.helixsoft.nl/blog/?p=127&#038;cpage=1#comment-365</link>
		<dc:creator>Groovy way to fix up a WikiPathways Pathway &#171; Helixsoft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.helixsoft.nl/blog/?p=127#comment-365</guid>
		<description>[...] It&#8217;s no secret that there are many mistakes in WikiPathways. A coworker notified me of a problem with a the Focal Adhesion pathway. It&#8217;s exactly the sort of a problem that requires a lot of repetitive action to be fixed. So I thought, instead of doing this the boring way, I write a program to do that instead, and have some fun with it at the same time. This is the perfect opportunity to get some practice with the WikiPathways webservice. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It&#8217;s no secret that there are many mistakes in WikiPathways. A coworker notified me of a problem with a the Focal Adhesion pathway. It&#8217;s exactly the sort of a problem that requires a lot of repetitive action to be fixed. So I thought, instead of doing this the boring way, I write a program to do that instead, and have some fun with it at the same time. This is the perfect opportunity to get some practice with the WikiPathways webservice. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
